There’s also an SD memory card slot at the front and an Ethernet port on the left-hand side; one thing which the WiFi-only Samsung couldn’t boast. USB 3.0 is still most useful for connecting external storage, so on a device designed to work with cloud-based services its omission isn’t a fatal flaw. Overall, the C7 provides a better balance of ports and sockets.
However, It’s not all bad news. The trackpad might be smaller, but it feels marginally more responsive than the one on the Samsung, particularly when it comes to two-finger gestures for scrolling or right-clicking. Meanwhile what’s become a Power button on Samsung’s Chromebooks, here returns to its original role: Delete. While I prefer the crisper typing action on the Samsung, I wouldn’t call the C7’s keyboard a disaster by any means. In fact, I’m using it to write this review right now, and barely missing a keystroke.
When you’re looking at photos or watching video, the C7 delivers stronger pictures and better colours every time. When it comes to sound, the C7 is a little less impressive. It’s hard to get a beefy output out of a laptop this size, and even harder when you’re doing so on such a tight budget. The Acer’s audio is weak, tinny and lacking bass and clarity. If you want to stream music or watch a film you’d better plug some headphones in.
I still wouldn’t want to use a Chromebook to do heavy-duty photo or video-editing, or even use one as my main PC, but as a cheap, highly mobile, secondary computer it’s perfectly adequate for everyday use. There’s zero maintenance, and it doesn’t waste your time. What’s more, the way Chrome OS works, with everything tied into your Google account and your desktop and app selection changing to match, makes a Chromebook perfect for sharing with a family, an office or a class. There’s not much of a learning curve when it comes to using it, and the more I use Chrome OS, the more I like it. Understand the limitations of working across an Internet connection - particularly in low-bandwidth situations - and you’ll probably feel the same.
On the good news front, the Celeron-powered C7 performs slightly better on intensive tasks than the ARM-powered Samsung. Where HD video streams stuttered every few seconds on the Samsung, they run reasonably smoothly on the Acer, and games like Bastion are just about playable. The C7’s SunSpider benchmark score is faster than the Samsung’s, at 523.1 to 758.2, and the WebGL Aquarium demo runs at a smooth 60fps to the Samsung’s 36 to 45fps. If you want to play 3D games then you’re barking up the wrong tree with a Chromebook, but you might want to watch films, and in this respect the Acer has the Samsung beat - though we hope to see software updates improve the performance from the Samsung’s perfectly capable Exynos SoC.
Ergonomics
Unfortunately, the C7’s smaller desktop footprint comes at a cost. Where the Samsung Chromebook has a relatively luxurious keyboard with generously sized keys, not to mention a surprisingly big touchpad, the Acer has to manage with only slightly smaller keys, but a more cramped layout. The Chrome OS-specific function keys in the top row are tiny, while the cursor keys are ridiculously minute. The hash key is actually jammed against the return key, and ditto for the backslash key and the left-shift.However, It’s not all bad news. The trackpad might be smaller, but it feels marginally more responsive than the one on the Samsung, particularly when it comes to two-finger gestures for scrolling or right-clicking. Meanwhile what’s become a Power button on Samsung’s Chromebooks, here returns to its original role: Delete. While I prefer the crisper typing action on the Samsung, I wouldn’t call the C7’s keyboard a disaster by any means. In fact, I’m using it to write this review right now, and barely missing a keystroke.
Screen and sound
The screen on the C7 is better than the screen on the Samsung Chromebook. It’s brighter, there’s more contrast, and whites look genuinely white and not slightly yellow. While it’s a TN screen with all the narrow viewing angles that implies, it still beats most netbook screens and even many budget laptops stone dead. The 11.6in size and 1,366 x 768 resolution match the Samsung, and the only advantage the latter is left with is that the matt surface will fare better in more lighting conditions than the Acer’s glossy coating.When you’re looking at photos or watching video, the C7 delivers stronger pictures and better colours every time. When it comes to sound, the C7 is a little less impressive. It’s hard to get a beefy output out of a laptop this size, and even harder when you’re doing so on such a tight budget. The Acer’s audio is weak, tinny and lacking bass and clarity. If you want to stream music or watch a film you’d better plug some headphones in.
Software
Having only just covered Chrome OS in the Samsung review, we won’t go overboard on it here. The important thing is that Google’s cloud-based OS is now ready for primetime. It has apps to cover most needs and scenarios, it supports a more conventional Windows-like UI with multiple windows, and the old complaint that a Chromebook is useless without an Internet connection no longer holds water. You can work on documents, spreadsheets and presentations offline and sync changes when you next connect, and you can also read and answer emails. The built-in file handlers for video, photos and PDFs offer more features and are easier to use, and file management as a whole is no longer a disaster.I still wouldn’t want to use a Chromebook to do heavy-duty photo or video-editing, or even use one as my main PC, but as a cheap, highly mobile, secondary computer it’s perfectly adequate for everyday use. There’s zero maintenance, and it doesn’t waste your time. What’s more, the way Chrome OS works, with everything tied into your Google account and your desktop and app selection changing to match, makes a Chromebook perfect for sharing with a family, an office or a class. There’s not much of a learning curve when it comes to using it, and the more I use Chrome OS, the more I like it. Understand the limitations of working across an Internet connection - particularly in low-bandwidth situations - and you’ll probably feel the same.
Performance
There’s good news and semi-bad news when it comes to performance. Acer’s decision to go with a 320GB conventional hard disk instead of an SSD probably makes sense from an economic standpoint - the C7 is clearly a re-purposed Windows laptop - but it means this Chromebook starts up slightly slower than the Samsung, taking roughly 19 seconds. This isn’t a massive issue, and the C7 doesn’t feel at all sluggish in everyday use, but it is peculiar. After all, it’s not like the cloud-centric Chrome OS is really built to capitalise on a larger drive.On the good news front, the Celeron-powered C7 performs slightly better on intensive tasks than the ARM-powered Samsung. Where HD video streams stuttered every few seconds on the Samsung, they run reasonably smoothly on the Acer, and games like Bastion are just about playable. The C7’s SunSpider benchmark score is faster than the Samsung’s, at 523.1 to 758.2, and the WebGL Aquarium demo runs at a smooth 60fps to the Samsung’s 36 to 45fps. If you want to play 3D games then you’re barking up the wrong tree with a Chromebook, but you might want to watch films, and in this respect the Acer has the Samsung beat - though we hope to see software updates improve the performance from the Samsung’s perfectly capable Exynos SoC.
Post A Comment:
0 comments: